To caution, this piece is not written in defense of Roger Federer’s GOATness. The two have not squared off at Wimbledon since 2008 when Nadal won the lengthy match in five sets. Check out our soccer betting predictions with the latest odds. If one-liner soundbite is lacking, let’s create one: Is not reaching the finals more rewarding than failing to reach there? How many titles would Rafa win and what the H2H with these players would look like? For all we know Federer could win the next 10 majors and not play Nadal in any of the those tournaments" (Tennis Week 7/15/08). Did Nadal win a title on all those 13 occasions when he eliminated Federer? A player often fails to participate due to poor fitness and under-preparation, which are parts of all sports. I am arguing against where and how the H2H logic is used. The same could be said of Courier, Rios, Medvedev, Costa, and Kuerten, other clay court specialists of his time: Had Sampras been good enough to advance to semis and finals on clay, each would have improved his H2H against Sampras. Everyone else on the ATP tour has combined to …

“And, of course, I’d love to play against him here at Wimbledon.”. Thomas Muster, who won six Masters on clay and one RG, was known as "the King of Clay" at his peak and would have leveled his H2H with Sampras (9-2), had Sampras been as good as Federer. One has to admit what the H2H trailing shows: a bad matchup. The task before Nadal is to level (or even exceed) the Slam tally of 15-6 than to enlarge upon 13-7 H2H. ", To back up their arguments, the Lees of this world brandish around only one card: Nadal has 13-7 H2H (5-2 in Slams) lead over Federer. Sergi Bruguera has better H2H against Sampras because of clay, and it could have been more lopsided had Sampras advanced to semis and finals on clay. And me, too. The originality of my argument lies in the new logic of Roger’s lead over Rafa by 29-20 in STE. And Roger’s lead stands tall at 29-20 in those 62 events participated. Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal square off for the 40th time in their careers. Powered by. Had Federer reached the Monte Carlo and Rome Masters finals this year and, let’s say, he lost both of them to Nadal, his H2H with Nadal would have increased to 7-15 in Federer’s disfavor. Are we saying Rafa is better than Fed on outdoor hard hard because Rafa would not make it to the other finals that Federer did, thus better H2H (2-1) on outdoor hard? The task before Nadal is to level (or even exceed) the Slam tally of 15-6 than to enlarge upon 13-7 H2H. Actually, one could include all tournaments available for a player to participate in a given time. Should we give Sampras higher mark for maintaining his H2H against his rivals because he escaped 17 Masters and did not advance beyond the third round except on eight occasions, clay Masters Series and RG combined (eight out of 36 in 13 years) and punish Federer for consistently reaching four RG finals and 11 Finals at the Masters on clay (advancing beyond third round on 25 out of 37 occasions in 11 years)? The biggest logical flaw lies in the ignorance of the fact that reaching a final is better than falling before it (reverse this: not reaching the finals is worse than trailing in H2H stat). The Tennis H2H Statistics up to 2020 for Players Nadal and Djokovic was recently updated at 04.11.2020 CET. Relationship [has] never changed.

Since Rafa’s Slam debut, Roger has reached the RG finals on all the occasions except one semi in 2005, providing Rafa with 100 percent opportunity for H2H clash. Tennis is single elimination sports, and you don’t have to beat the entire players of the draw. Due to higher ranking players’ leniency in the past toward honoring their automatic qualification into draws, from this year ATP/ITF has introduced a new rule to penalize for non-participation: "Once a player is accepted in the main draw of these twelve tournaments [13 in the case of the top 8]…his result will count…whether or not he participates" (ATP Rule 9.03 A, emphasis added). Federer’s game does not match up well with Nadal, for a number of well-known reasons. Check out our soccer betting predictions with the latest odds. 2008: The year of the last Wimbledon meeting between the two rivals. Yet, Lee revives the same principle that he once rightly jettisoned as cumbersome and absurd. Rafa did not play ‘04 SW19, ‘06 AO, and ‘09 SW19, the three occasions Roger won. The player who is unable to participate is awarded the same point as the one who loses in the first round; moreover, there are other penalties.

This article is intended to unveil the logical flaw behind the interpretation of this 13-7 H2H stat, which is often used negatively against Federer to delegitimize his achievement, whereas, I argue, it should be viewed as something positive to admire.

“I know he’s playing well. Livescores provided by Livescore.in.

(Acknowledgment: I appreciate my friend Huh’s logic, a Tennis X poster, inspiration, valuable comments and feedback from Nancy Drew, a Bleacher Report contributor, and a number of Tennis Planet posters Jennifur, YMD, Pommesdesuisse, Chipnputt, Sarah, Banti, Sol, Ch, Andy, Mircea, Ash, Sam, Bella, Rafa4ever, and Alex. Rafael Nadal vs Novak Djokovic h2h tennis stats & betting tips.

Did Roger do better or did he not, especially in comparison to Rafa’s record on hard court Slams, AO and USO? Were not Rafa’s two final encounters with Roger at Wimbledon more respectable than the others in which he did not make it to the finals or could not participate in? It is comprehensive because it takes into account all the tournaments participated, and it does greater justice because it acknowledges the depth of field, i.e. Roger’s 80 percent of the titles (12 out of 15) came from the same Slams that Rafa played. ", At times, the H2H interpretation has been analogous to a conspiracy theory. Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are the only players to have won 50+ tier 1 tournaments. Federer has won 20 Grand Slams, while Nadal trails slightly with 18 major titles. So, one could add these 12 to Roger’s total H2H, in which Rafa lost long before the finals, which should be counted as less favorable than H2H (interpret H2H as reaching the finals, at least since the time Rafa has been number 2 or 1). Is that what we have arrived at? Nadal is favored to get to the final with -140 odds. How about Sampras, who reached RG semi only once? And he quotes Sampras, "Tough question to answer. Thanks heaven, tennis is not boxing and you don't win a championship by challenging and beating the title holder. So, can we say that Federer performed better by not reaching the finals of those two clay Masters Series and therefore not allowing Nadal to beat him (which most assume to have happened had he faced Nadal) to make his H2H look even worse against Nadal? I think Rafa does not need to and will not use this H2H card to establish his position among the Greats in the history of tennis, or to inch closer to Federer: Rafa is already among the Greats, and undoubtedly he possesses immense talents and has plenty of time at his disposal to get closer to (or even transcend) Federer, though that may appear long distance for now but not impossible. I do understand the argument as being the best ever you have to be the best of your generation and he has come up short against Nadal. This leads to question their motive of undermining Federer’s achievement, evidently because it is too big for them to digest in a short period of time, or that more than a few great players’ endorsements of Federer as the Greatest of All Time must have been baffling for them. Speaking on equalling Federer, Nadal said, "Today I don't think about equalling Roger, today for me is the Roland Garros victory. READ: French Open 2020 Nadal vs Schwartzman semi-final live stream in India, preview and H2H. (Another way to look at this is, in boxing format, Murray would not have gotten a chance to play Federer until this year; Rafa would not have played Federer in 2005 Roland Garros semifinal, either). Once qualified to play, a player is honored to cherish and participate. Federer has done just that in the past: Second only to Rafa, he reached the most finals of the clay Masters Series and French Open from 2004-2009, with the hope of winning the title in each (eight runner-ups and six titles, beating Nadal in Hamburg 2007 and Madrid 2009). Yes, it is convenient to throw one-liner stat, 13-7 overall or 5-2 at the Slam level, but there is so much into it, and, yes, the flaw lies in the conclusion that Federer critics draw out of this H2H stat. It is not intended to downplay Rafael Nadal’s achievement either, definitely not his clean six Slams. Federer has won 20 Grand Slams, while Nadal trails slightly with 18 major titles.

He feels comfortable here. Primarily, what 13-7, or specifically 9-2, means is Federer was there on all those occasions, beating 4 to 6 most successful players of the draw to reach the finals. Back then, it was reasonable to base the greatness on H2H when tours were conducted in such a fashion. Would not Rafa have preferred to reach the hard court Slam finals in those missed occasions? If H2H proponents have employed this logic to break a tie between two players with equal number of Slams for historical purpose, that would probably not have been objectionable.

Had Djokovic not been in the finals of those two clay masters and semi of Madrid, his H2H with Nadal would have stayed at 4-11 in his disfavor, better than the current 4-14 deficit. Certainly, Rafa is not among those players. Suggestions? Neither of them won in 13 of those. Nadal does hold the advantage in head-to-head Grand Slam matchups with a 10-3 record, per Action Network . Head To Head.

Getty Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer are still considered in pole position to win a slam after so many years Roger won 12 times in those same 21 slams that Rafa was also playing. “But it was a joy to play against Rafa there, on his court,” Federer said. Moreover, should Federer have decided to intentionally lose before the 4th round at Madrid and RG, fearing his H2H would slide further? Check out our football betting predictions with the latest odds. Nadal: 2/5 Livescores provided by Livescore.in.

That’s all. Nadal has a 24-15 advantage over Federer heading into their semifinal matchup at Wimbledon, per ATP Tour. But by playing good enough to reach the finals and semifinals in clay tournaments, Djokovic allowed Nadal to widen H2H to 4-14, in his own disfavor. All together, Sampras did not participate in 17 clay Masters.

Rafa would have been 0-11 H2H on hard court (in 2005 and 2008 AO, Roger lost in Semi, so these are subtracted), i.e. The guy, Federer, who was unable to reach the finals but was able to save his record from worsening, or the other guy, Djokovic, who played good enough to reach the finals knowing Nadal’s invincibility on clay and allowing his own H2H to worsen? Bayern vs Dortmund H2H stats. 33 (1987.05.15) Age 34 (1986.06.03) Glasgow, Scotland Birthplace Manacor, Mallorca, Spain Surrey, England For example, Lee goes as far as to suggest, "[Y]ou can make a clear case he [Federer] is not even the best of this time. Would not those finals be more rewarding for Rafa? The Big Four have collectively won 60 Major titles (with Federer and Nadal a … Nadal does hold the advantage in head-to-head Grand Slam matchups with a 10-3 record, per Action Network. Federer admitted he is looking forward to another matchup with Nadal. To give a postmodern twist, we may call it a post-H2H logic.

Even before this rule came into existence, acceptance into the draws of these Masters Series and Slams were expected to be honored without exception. Both Roger and Rafa participated in the same 62 tournaments, with a combined win total of 49 titles. Since Rafa’s Slam debut in 2003 Wimbledon, he has played in the same 21 Slams that Roger played (Roger played four more during the same period). This is a record in itself, four consecutive French Open finals, tying with only three others Borg, Lendl, and Nadal. Although he officially turned pro in 2001, the beginning of Rafa could be reasonably pinned down to 2003 Wimbledon, the major that he automatically qualified for.

When ATP/ITF does not even consider using H2H stat as one of the ways to break a tie between two players’ rankings, Federer’s critics have been using this H2H statistics to question the best of the generation and/ or best of all times.

Manoir à Vendre Etats Unis, Orientation Collège, Nadal Roland-garros 2012, Symbole Mathématique Ensemble Des Réels, Liquider Synonyme 6 Lettres, Sujet Bac Tunisie 1986, Sujets Corrigés Physique-chimie Bac S, Sujet Bac 1989, île à Vendre écosse, Notation Latin Bac 2021, Amina Walter Origines, Classe Virtuelle Bbcollab, Sujet Bac S > Histoire 2019, Intégrer Une école D'architecture Après Une Licence, école De Photographie Nantes, Mateus Blanc, Anaïs Bouton Zemmour, Calendrier 2018 Pdf, Bac G2 Comptabilité Pdf, Illan Et Yumee, Compétences Du Drh, Edhec 2011 Maths Ecs Corrigé, Piste Synonyme, Exercice Physique Chimie Corrigé, Réservation Ryanair Site Officiel, Exemple Sujet Grand Oral Bac 2021 St2s, Judith Chemla Mariage, évier Profond Céramique, Synonyme De Mépris, Du Dgemc, Menu Sport Bac 2021, Manque De Salive Mots Fléchés, Caravelle Plastique Occasion, Restaurant Vila Real, Constellation De L'aigle, Annales Bac 2021 Terminale, Kayak De Mer Randonnée,